Dashboard › Demo Universe › Atlas Logistics

Atlas Logistics · ATLS

DEMO DATAUNDERWRITING ASSUMPTIONHOLD
Investment memorandum · demo data

Atlas Logistics (ATLS) — First-Lien Term Loan

DEMO DATAUNDERWRITING ASSUMPTION
HOLD

Executive Summary

Demo purchase of $100M face of First-Lien Term Loan at 96.5 (cash investment $97.0M): current yield 8.2%, yield to maturity 11.1%. Recommendation: HOLD. Credit score 56/100 (Elevated risk). Base-case IRR 11.3%, downside 8.3%, severe 1.7%; probability-weighted IRR 7.8% vs a 12% hurdle; weighted P(default) 45%; severe-case valuation recovery 78%. HOLD (do not size yet): Base-case IRR clears hurdle (11.3% vs ≥ 12.0%); Expected-cash-flow IRR (probability-weighted) clears hurdle (7.8% vs ≥ 12.0%); Principal protected in severe case (recovery ≥ price) (78 vs 96.5 vs recovery ≥ price).

Investment Thesis

Term loan at 96.5 matures June 2027 and should refinance in the base case; the question is downside. Short-dated loan with asset coverage of 1.3x is a short-duration pull-to-par candidate if the refinancing window stays open.

The question: Does a 11.1% yield on a rank-1 secured claim compensate for 45% probability-weighted default risk and 22% severe-case loss?

Company Overview

Truckload, brokerage and warehousing operator with freight-cycle exposure and a 2027 term loan maturity. HQ Memphis, TN; Transportation / Asset-Light Freight & Warehousing. FY2025A revenue $2.8B, EBITDA $308M (11.0% margin); total debt $1.5B, cash $140M. DEMO DATA

Industry / Market

Freight is in a prolonged soft patch; balance sheets with near-term maturities are the ones that matter.

Historical Financial Performance

$MFY2022AFY2023AFY2024AFY2025A
Revenue$2.9B$3.0B$2.8B$2.8B
% growth1.7%-4.4%-0.7%
Direct costs / COGS$2.2B$2.3B$2.2B$2.2B
Gross profit (NOI for real estate)$681.5M$678.5M$634.5M$616.0M
% margin23.5%23.0%22.5%22.0%
Operating expenses (cash, adjusted)$319.0M$324.5M$310.2M$308.0M
EBITDA (company-adjusted basis)$362.5M$354.0M$324.3M$308.0M
% margin12.5%12.0%11.5%11.0%
D&A$145.0M$147.5M$141.0M$140.0M
Share-based compensation$0.0M$0.0M$0.0M$0.0M
EBIT$217.5M$206.5M$183.3M$168.0M
Interest expense$91.6M$97.0M$102.4M$107.8M
EBT$125.9M$109.5M$80.9M$60.2M
Taxes$31.5M$27.4M$20.2M$15.1M
Net income (model basis)$94.4M$82.1M$60.7M$45.2M
Capex$174.0M$177.0M$169.2M$168.0M
Working capital & other cash items$6.8M$6.0M($15.6M)($2.4M)
Free cash flow$58.6M$46.6M$48.1M$19.6M

Capital Structure

TrancheRankSecuredFace valueRateMaturityMark / price
ABL Revolver1Yes$150.0MS+350bp2028-02-29—
First-Lien Term Loan1Yes$600.0MS+365bp2027-06-3096.5
Senior Unsecured Notes 6.50%3No$750.0M6.50%2030-05-1590.0

Total debt $1.5B (4.9x EBITDA); net debt $1.4B; liquidity $340M; loan-to-value through the target tranche 39%.

Credit Analysis

Net leverage 4.4x, EBITDA / interest 2.86x, FCF / debt 1.3%, DSCR 1.1x, liquidity ratio 3.0x. Score components: Leverage 8/15, Coverage 7/15, Liquidity 10/10, Free cash flow 2/10, Maturity risk 0/10, Margin stability 10/10, Revenue stability 8/8, Asset coverage 6/12, Industry risk 5/10. Score change vs FY2024A (same capital structure): 60 → 56 (Net leverage increased from 4.2x to 4.4x (-0.7 pts, negative); Interest coverage fell from 3.2x to 2.9x (-1.2 pts, negative); FCF / debt fell from 3.2% to 1.3% (-1.4 pts, negative)).

Debt Maturity Profile

PeriodDebt due% of debtProjected liquidity (Base)Refinancing requirement
FY2027E$600M40%$375M$225M
FY2028E$150M10%$380M—
FY2030E$750M50%$456M$294M

Risk flag: $600M maturity in FY2027E; only $375M projected liquidity; $225M refinancing requirement.

Risk flag: $750M maturity in FY2030E; only $456M projected liquidity; $294M refinancing requirement.

TrancheMaturesBalance at maturityCash on handNet lev. (test ≤)Pro-forma coverage (test ≥)Refi rateInterest burden afterResultResolution
First-Lien Term LoanFY2027E$588.0M$0M4.1x (8.5x)3.28x (1.20x)8.5%$48.1MREFINANCING PASSPartly repaid from cash; remainder refinanced
ABL RevolverFY2028E$3.6M$0M3.9x (8.5x)3.49x (1.20x)8.5%$0.0MREFINANCING PASSRepaid from cash
Senior Unsecured Notes 6.50%FY2030E$750.0M$58M3.4x (8.5x)3.29x (1.20x)8.5%$55.3MREFINANCING PASSPartly repaid from cash; remainder refinanced

Base Case

Revenue CAGR 2.0%; FY2030E EBITDA $365M (11.8% margin); trough EBITDA $314M; peak net leverage 4.3x; minimum EBITDA / interest 2.91x; cumulative FCF $162M. No payment default modelled. IRR 11.3%, MOIC 1.11x.

Downside Case

Revenue CAGR -1.4%; FY2030E EBITDA $224M (8.6% margin); trough EBITDA $169M; peak net leverage 8.7x; minimum EBITDA / interest 1.56x; cumulative FCF ($303M). Payment default modelled in FY2027E; target-tranche recovery 100%. IRR 8.3%, MOIC 1.25x.

Severe Downside

Revenue CAGR -7.7%; FY2030E EBITDA $94M (5.0% margin); trough EBITDA $26M; peak net leverage 61.6x; minimum EBITDA / interest 0.21x; cumulative FCF ($750M). Payment default modelled in FY2027E; target-tranche recovery 78%. IRR 1.7%, MOIC 1.05x.

Covenant Analysis

Base Case
Maximum net leverage UNDERWRITING ASSUMPTION HYPOTHETICAL — underwriting assumption
FY2026EFY2027EFY2028EFY2029EFY2030E
Current metric4.29x4.04x3.80x3.54x3.28x
Covenant≤ 5.50x≤ 5.50x≤ 5.50x≤ 5.50x≤ 5.50x
Headroom1.21x (22%)1.46x (26%)1.70x (31%)1.96x (36%)2.22x (40%)
StatusPASSPASSPASSPASSPASS
Downside
Maximum net leverage UNDERWRITING ASSUMPTION HYPOTHETICAL — underwriting assumption
FY2026EFY2027EFY2028EFY2029EFY2030E
Current metric6.77x8.73x8.36x7.90x7.42x
Covenant≤ 5.50x≤ 5.50x≤ 5.50x≤ 5.50x≤ 5.50x
Headroom−1.27x (-23%)−3.23x (-59%)−2.86x (-52%)−2.40x (-44%)−1.92x (-35%)
StatusBREACHBREACHBREACHBREACHBREACH

Recovery Analysis

If the company defaults, recovery value is $715M (liquidation) in the severe case → 78% recovery (22% LGD) on the target tranche; downside 100%. Recovery value = MAX(going concern $131M, liquidation $715M) + cash, less administrative costs; severe case struck at FY2027E.

Claim (by seniority)RankClaimRecoveryRecovery %LossLoss %
Recovery value$715.0M
Less: administrative / DIP costs($28.6M)
ABL Revolver1$279.0M$217.0M77.8%$62.0M22.2%
First-Lien Term Loan1$603.7M$469.4M77.8%$134.2M22.2%
Senior Unsecured Notes 6.50%3$762.2M$0.0M0.0%$762.2M100.0%
Total claims$1.6B$686.4M$958.4M
Equity (residual)$0.0MWiped out

Investment Returns

Base CaseDownsideSevere Downside
Face value / purchase price / cash investment$100M / 96.5 / $97.0M UNDERWRITING ASSUMPTION
Cash interest + exit/recovery proceeds$7.9M + $100.0M$18.6M + $102.3M$21.6M + $79.8M
Capital gain / (loss) vs purchase price$3.5M$5.8M($16.7M)
MOIC1.11x1.25x1.05x
IRR (hurdle 12%)11.3%8.3%1.7%

Key Risks

  • Refinancing: $600M maturity in FY2027E; only $375M projected liquidity; $225M refinancing requirement.
  • Severe case produces a payment default in FY2027E.
  • Severe-case valuation recovery of 78% is below the 96.5 purchase price: a 22% loss given default.
  • Covenants breach in the Downside case (FY2026E); none in the Base case.
  • Elevated leverage: net debt / EBITDA 4.4x.

Key Protections

  • First-priority secured position on substantially all assets; 0% of recovery value is senior to us and 39% through our tranche.
  • Coverage of 2.86x EBITDA / interest; EBITDA can fall 65% before coverage reaches 1.0x.
  • Liquidity of $340M (23% of total debt).
  • Base-case refinancing tests pass for all 3 maturing tranche(s); 1 are repaid from cash.
  • Short-dated pull-to-par

Catalysts

  • Refinancing launch in H2-2026
  • Freight index turn

Due Diligence Items

ItemStatusPriorityOpen question
Working capital and capex needsIssue IdentifiedMediumAre capex and working capital run-rates sustainable?
Revenue and customer concentrationNot StartedMediumTop-10 customer share and contract terms?
Supplier concentrationNot StartedLowAny single-source dependencies?
Competitive position and managementNot StartedMediumShare trend and management track record?
Debt documentation reviewIn ProgressHighPriming / drop-down protections and baskets?
Covenant package and definitionsIn ProgressHighCovenant EBITDA definition and headroom?
Maturity profile and refinancing planIn ProgressHighIs the refinancing plan credible at current leverage?
Guarantees and structural subordinationIssue IdentifiedMediumWhich entities guarantee; any non-guarantor leakage?
Industry conditions and pricingNot StartedMediumWhere are we in the industry cycle?
Macro and rate sensitivityNot StartedLowHow does the credit behave at +300 bps?

Recommendation

HOLD. HOLD (do not size yet): Base-case IRR clears hurdle (11.3% vs ≥ 12.0%); Expected-cash-flow IRR (probability-weighted) clears hurdle (7.8% vs ≥ 12.0%); Principal protected in severe case (recovery ≥ price) (78 vs 96.5 vs recovery ≥ price).

TestActualRequiredWeight
✗Base-case IRR clears hurdle11.3%≥ 12.0%core
✗Expected-cash-flow IRR (probability-weighted) clears hurdle7.8%≥ 12.0%core
✓Downside IRR stays above floor8.3%≥ 0.0%core
✓Downside recovery meets minimum (valuation waterfall)100.0%≥ 60.0%core
✓Base-case refinancing succeedsPASSPASScore
✓Entry yield meets minimum11.1%≥ 9.0%secondary
✓Net leverage within maximum4.4x≤ 6.0xsecondary
✓Covenant headroom (base case, minimum)22.0%≥ 15.0%secondary
✗Principal protected in severe case (recovery ≥ price)78 vs 96.5recovery ≥ pricesecondary
✗No unresolved high-priority diligence3 open0 opensecondary

What would change my mind?

  • EBITDA declines more than 65% from FY2025A (coverage < 1.0x) — or more than 20% (first covenant breaks).
  • The entry price is above 95.9: the base case no longer earns the 12% hurdle (assumed price 96.5).
  • Severe-case recovery returns the purchase price only if the distressed valuation multiple is at least 34.0x EBITDA (the severe case assumes 5.0x); the question is how much cushion we want.
  • Collateral / enterprise value falls more than 59% from the base-case valuation: the tranche starts to take losses.
  • Market access weakens: base-case pro-forma coverage at refinancing is 3.28x vs the 1.20x test, at an assumed 8.5% refinancing rate — a higher spread or lower EBITDA flips the test.
Sources (3)
SourceDocumentData typePeriodAccessionDoc dateRetrievedClass
CreditIQ demo datasetAtlas Logistics — illustrative financial statements FY2022–FY2025Income statement / cash flowFY2022–FY2025—2026-03-312026-03-31DEMO DATA
CreditIQ demo datasetAtlas Logistics — illustrative capital structure & covenantsDebt scheduleAs of 2026-03-31—2026-03-312026-03-31DEMO DATA
CreditIQ demo datasetIllustrative indicative bid marks (% of par)Market price2026-03-31—2026-03-312026-03-31DEMO DATA

Generated entirely from the structured model (inputs → analysis → memo): every figure reconciles to the Excel workbook (see Settings → Reconciliation). Hypothetical terms are underwriting assumptions. Not investment advice.