Dashboard › Demo Universe › Tidewater Office Partners
Tidewater Office Partners · TWOP
DEMO DATAUNDERWRITING ASSUMPTIONPASSHow one assumption propagates: statements → cash flow → debt → metrics → covenants → refinancing → default → recovery → returns
ANALYST PROJECTION| Stage | Base Case | Downside | Severe Downside |
|---|---|---|---|
| ① Revenue growth (avg) → revenue (period 5) | -2.0% → $307M | -3.0% → $292M | -7.4% → $228M |
| ② EBITDA margin (period 1 → 5) → trough EBITDA | 57.5% → 58.3% → $179M | 55.0% → 55.5% → $162M | 51.5% → 52.5% → $120M |
| ③ Cumulative FCF (5 periods) | $225M | $121M | ($76M) |
| ④ Rate shock → period-1 cash interest | +0bp → $109M | +150bp → $114M | +300bp → $119M |
| ⑤ Peak net leverage · min EBITDA/interest | 8.5x · 1.76x | 9.8x · 1.53x | 14.7x · 1.04x |
| ⑥ Covenants: first breach | none | FY2027E | FY2026E |
| ⑦ Refinancing tests (pass / fail) | 0 / 3 | 0 / 3 | 0 / 3 |
| ⑧ Payment default | FY2026E | FY2026E | FY2026E |
| ⑨ Recovery value → target-tranche recovery | $1.6B (liquidation) → 100% | $1.4B (liquidation) → 48% | $1.1B (liquidation) → 0% |
| ⑩ IRR · MOIC | 24.9% · 1.53x | -10.5% · 0.82x | -84.0% · 0.16x |
Scenario probabilities: Base Case 55% · Downside 30% · Severe Downside 15% (analyst assumption). Edit any assumption in the lab below to watch every stage move.
Scenario assumptions
| Base Case | Downside | Severe Downside | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (period 1 / period 5) | -2.0% / -2.0% | -6.6% / -2.0% | -19.8% / -2.0% |
| EBITDA margin (period 1 / period 5) | 57.5% / 58.3% | 55.0% / 55.5% | 51.5% / 52.5% |
| Capex % revenue | 12.0% | 11.4% | 9.6% |
| Other cash items % revenue (+ outflow) | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.6% |
| Net asset sales (period 1, $M) | $0M | $0M | $0M |
| Floating-rate shock | +0 bp | +150 bp | +300 bp |
| Refinancing rate | 8.0% | 10.5% | 13.0% |
| Market access: max net leverage / min coverage | 8.5x / 1.20x | 5.5x / 1.80x | 5.0x / 2.00x |
| Exit multiple / distressed multiple | 9.0x / 6.5x | 7.5x / 6.5x | 6.0x / 6.5x |
| Exit price cap (non-default) | 100 | 90 | 70 |
| Asset value decline / liquidation recovery | 0% / 80% | 15% / 80% | 35% / 80% |
EBITDA ($M)
Free cash flow ($M)
Net debt / EBITDA
Scenario engine — change assumptions and watch them propagate
Start from:Edits flow through statements → debt → metrics → covenants → refinancing → default → recovery → returns.
Assumptions (edit)
| FY2026E | FY2027E | FY2028E | FY2029E | FY2030E | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth | % | % | % | % | % |
| EBITDA margin | % | % | % | % | % |
| Asset sales ($M) |
Result — Second-Priority Term Loan @ 72
Default?
Yes — FY2026E
Covenant breaches
4
Recovery
48%
IRR
-10.5%
MOIC
0.82x
Lines: Base EBITDA (blue) vs your custom case (orange), $M.
| $M | FY2026E | FY2027E | FY2028E | FY2029E | FY2030E |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $318M | $307M | $304M | $298M | $292M |
| EBITDA | $175M | $166M | $166M | $164M | $162M |
| Cash interest | $114M | $109M | $107M | $104M | $104M |
| FCF | $25M | $22M | $24M | $25M | $24M |
| Cash | $0M | $0M | $0M | $25M | $50M |
| Total debt | $1.7B | $1.6B | $1.6B | $1.6B | $1.6B |
| Net lev. | 9.5x | 9.8x | 9.7x | 9.7x | 9.6x |
| EBITDA/int. | 1.5x | 1.5x | 1.6x | 1.6x | 1.6x |