Orchard Foods · ORCH
DEMO DATAUNDERWRITING ASSUMPTIONHOLDRecovery waterfall by scenario
ANALYST PROJECTIONRecovery value = MAX(going-concern value, liquidation value) + cash, less administrative costs, then distributed by seniority (strict absolute priority; equal ranks pari passu). Going concern = distressed EV/EBITDA multiple × EBITDA at the valuation event; liquidation = asset base × (1 − decline) × liquidation recovery. Valuation event = the payment-default period, or — if no default is modelled — a hypothetical default at the trough-EBITDA period (so protection is always measured). Specific liens are paid from their own collateral pool; any deficiency joins general creditors. Illustrative appraised / collateral value (DEMO)
Base Case — FY2026E (hypothetical default at trough EBITDA; no default modelled)
| Claim (by seniority) | Rank | Claim | Recovery | Recovery % | Loss | Loss % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recovery value | $3.5B | |||||
| Less: administrative / DIP costs | ($138.9M) | |||||
| First-Lien Term Loan | 1 | $907.9M | $907.9M | 100.0% | $0.0M | 0.0% |
| Senior Notes 5.50% | 3 | $811.0M | $811.0M | 100.0% | $0.0M | 0.0% |
| Subordinated Notes 8.25% | 4 | $510.3M | $510.3M | 100.0% | $0.0M | 0.0% |
| Total claims | $2.2B | $2.2B | $0.0M | |||
| Equity (residual) | $1.1B | In the money | ||||
Downside — FY2027E (hypothetical default at trough EBITDA; no default modelled)
| Claim (by seniority) | Rank | Claim | Recovery | Recovery % | Loss | Loss % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recovery value | $2.8B | |||||
| Less: administrative / DIP costs | ($111.2M) | |||||
| First-Lien Term Loan | 1 | $901.5M | $901.5M | 100.0% | $0.0M | 0.0% |
| Senior Notes 5.50% | 3 | $811.0M | $811.0M | 100.0% | $0.0M | 0.0% |
| Subordinated Notes 8.25% | 4 | $510.3M | $510.3M | 100.0% | $0.0M | 0.0% |
| Total claims | $2.2B | $2.2B | $0.0M | |||
| Equity (residual) | $446.2M | In the money | ||||
Severe Downside — FY2029E (modelled payment default)
| Claim (by seniority) | Rank | Claim | Recovery | Recovery % | Loss | Loss % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recovery value | $1.7B | |||||
| Less: administrative / DIP costs | ($69.0M) | |||||
| First-Lien Term Loan | 1 | $645.2M | $645.2M | 100.0% | $0.0M | 0.0% |
| Senior Notes 5.50% | 3 | $811.0M | $811.0M | 100.0% | $0.0M | 0.0% |
| Subordinated Notes 8.25% | 4 | $510.3M | $200.3M | 39.3% | $310.0M | 60.7% |
| Total claims | $2.0B | $1.7B | $310.0M | |||
| Equity (residual) | $0.0M | Wiped out | ||||
Recovery lab — change valuation assumptions and watch the waterfall re-allocate
Going-concern $1.5B vs liquidation $1.1B → recovery value = MAX = $1.5B (used: going concern, $1.5B). Claims = current face value + 3 months accrued interest.
| Claim (by seniority) | Rank | Claim | Recovery | Recovery % | Loss | Loss % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recovery value | $1.5B | |||||
| Less: administrative / DIP costs | ($60.6M) | |||||
| First-Lien Term Loan | 1 | $917.1M | $917.1M | 100.0% | $0.0M | 0.0% |
| Senior Notes 5.50% | 3 | $811.0M | $536.8M | 66.2% | $274.2M | 33.8% |
| Subordinated Notes 8.25% | 4 | $510.3M | $0.0M | 0.0% | $510.3M | 100.0% |
| Total claims | $2.2B | $1.5B | $784.5M | |||
| Equity (residual) | $0.0M | Wiped out | ||||