Dashboard › Real Underwriting Cases › Brandywine Realty Trust
Brandywine Realty Trust · BDN
PUBLIC DATA CASEHYPOTHETICAL INVESTMENT TERMSHOLDHow one assumption propagates: statements → cash flow → debt → metrics → covenants → refinancing → default → recovery → returns
ANALYST PROJECTION| Stage | Base Case | Downside | Severe Downside |
|---|---|---|---|
| ① Revenue growth (avg) → revenue (period 5) | 1.0% → $523M | -1.4% → $463M | -3.8% → $409M |
| ② EBITDA margin (period 1 → 5) → trough EBITDA | 53.0% → 54.0% → $256M | 50.0% → 49.5% → $220M | 46.0% → 44.0% → $172M |
| ③ Cumulative FCF (5 periods) | ($436M) | ($320M) | ($319M) |
| ④ Rate shock → period-1 cash interest | +0bp → $180M | +150bp → $187M | +300bp → $195M |
| ⑤ Peak net leverage · min EBITDA/interest | 10.0x · 1.34x | 12.0x · 1.18x | 15.8x · 0.90x |
| ⑥ Covenants: first breach | LTM Jun-27E | LTM Jun-27E | LTM Jun-27E |
| ⑦ Refinancing tests (pass / fail) | 7 / 0 | 0 / 7 | 0 / 7 |
| ⑧ Payment default | none | LTM Jun-28E | LTM Jun-28E |
| ⑨ Recovery value → target-tranche recovery | $4.0B (liquidation) → 100% | $3.3B (liquidation) → 100% | $2.7B (liquidation) → 100% |
| ⑩ IRR · MOIC | 9.6% · 1.29x | 8.7% · 1.26x | 9.9% · 1.29x |
Scenario probabilities: Base Case 50% · Downside 35% · Severe Downside 15% (analyst assumption). Edit any assumption in the lab below to watch every stage move.
Scenario assumptions
| Base Case | Downside | Severe Downside | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (period 1 / period 5) | -3.0% / 2.0% | -6.0% / 1.0% | -10.0% / 1.0% |
| EBITDA margin (period 1 / period 5) | 53.0% / 54.0% | 50.0% / 49.5% | 46.0% / 44.0% |
| Capex % revenue | 22.0% | 18.0% | 13.0% |
| Other cash items % revenue (+ outflow) | 11.0% | 5.0% | 0.0% |
| Net asset sales (period 1, $M) | $200M | $150M | $100M |
| Floating-rate shock | +0 bp | +150 bp | +300 bp |
| Refinancing rate | 8.0% | 10.0% | 12.0% |
| Market access: max net leverage / min coverage | 11.0x / 1.20x | 9.5x / 1.50x | 9.0x / 1.75x |
| Exit multiple / distressed multiple | 12.5x / 10.0x | 11.0x / 9.0x | 9.5x / 8.0x |
| Exit price cap (non-default) | 100 | 95 | 85 |
| Asset value decline / liquidation recovery | 0% / 85% | 15% / 85% | 30% / 85% |
EBITDA ($M)
Free cash flow ($M)
Net debt / EBITDA
Scenario engine — change assumptions and watch them propagate
Start from:Edits flow through statements → debt → metrics → covenants → refinancing → default → recovery → returns.
Assumptions (edit)
| LTM Jun-27E | LTM Jun-28E | LTM Jun-29E | LTM Jun-30E | LTM Jun-31E | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth | % | % | % | % | % |
| EBITDA margin | % | % | % | % | % |
| Asset sales ($M) |
Result — Hypothetical Senior Secured Term Loan (S+525, 1% floor) @ 98
Default?
Yes — LTM Jun-28E
Covenant breaches
15
Recovery
100%
IRR
8.7%
MOIC
1.26x
Lines: Base EBITDA (blue) vs your custom case (orange), $M.
| $M | LTM Jun-27E | LTM Jun-28E | LTM Jun-29E | LTM Jun-30E | LTM Jun-31E |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $468M | $454M | $454M | $459M | $463M |
| EBITDA | $234M | $220M | $220M | $225M | $229M |
| Cash interest | $187M | $186M | $183M | $182M | $182M |
| FCF | ($61M) | ($70M) | ($67M) | ($63M) | ($59M) |
| Cash | $123M | $0M | ($71M) | ($138M) | ($201M) |
| Total debt | $2.6B | $2.6B | $2.6B | $2.6B | $2.6B |
| Net lev. | 10.7x | 11.7x | 12.0x | 12.0x | 12.0x |
| EBITDA/int. | 1.2x | 1.2x | 1.2x | 1.2x | 1.3x |